March 30, 2006
MANN TALK: The Yank on the Womb
By Perry Mann
Hinton, WV (Special to HNN) – A woman columnist advocating motherhood
quotes a reformed feminist: “Motherhood is about deciding not to fight
that ancient and biological yank on the womb, that natural order of the soul
that says you should be there. I am a committed feminist, and there’s
nothing more powerful to me than refusing to abandon motherhood.”
The yank of biology is not just on the womb of women, it is upon the seeds
of men and upon all the other organs and cells of women and men and upon the
animals and plants and on all the building blocks of the universe; and it
is a yank that can be ignored only at the cost of discontent of spirit,
malaise of soul and diseases of body and mind of all mankind.
The premise that God hammered out on a heavenly anvil man and woman
specially in his image and breathed an eternal soul into them, created all
else in six work days, fashioned Eden as the depository of his labors,
endowed man and woman with free will, who straight away disobeyed Him,
and thus lost all, is a fiction, a fiction of little consequence had not
man accepted it as absolute truth and proceeded to build a civilization upon
that fiction.
Too late, it appears, Darwin comes along and discovers that man and woman
are animals with a long history of evolution during which they and all else
were hammered out on nature’s anvil not in six work days but over billions
of years, that he and she are species of a balanced biological whole
created from the inorganic, that they are programmed to perpetuate
themselves and that they are subject to the laws of gravity, physics and
chemistry and all other laws that govern the galaxy, stars and planets.
And the womb.
Too late, I say, because man, in his egocentrism, his belief in his
semi-divinity and in his rebellion against God, has turned his back on
his natural home and way; built the city-fortress, in which he thinks he
is master of his fate and captain of his destiny; and in the process of
building, he has raped, ransacked, wrecked, polluted, pillaged ,
vandalized his natural habitat and squandered his natural legacy for the
trivial, for possessions and power, for gelt and gilt, and to devise
marvelous remedies to mitigate the exactions of the Verities and the
inexorable consequences of his infidelities to his Creator and the natural
order. And he has left and is leaving to his progeny, to his children and
his children’s children, a mess of things relative to what is really needed
for them to live fully, naturally, and wholesomely.
Man’s first error was leaving the land, where no man was unemployed, where
every child had a place from birth, where men, women and children and ox and
horse and all the other domesticated animals comprised a unity of survival,
in which they worked together, played together, rejoiced together and
sorrowed together; and where they lived under sky and sun, labored in
fields and meadows, watched the seasons come and go, stored up in summer
against winter, sowed in spring to harvest in fall, honored mother and
father and sat at the feet of aged, on and on from generation to generation,
knowing in their hearts that even if heaven were a fiction they had known
the fullness of living.
The next mistake was the city. It was built to defy God’s eviction of
Adam and Eve from Eden and to subvert and negate the decree that after the
Disobedience man must earn bread by the sweat of his brow, and it was
built primarily by those who dreamed of schemes to expropriate bread by
cunning from those who had by sweat produced it. The city preyed and still
preys on the countryside in every way, attracting the unwary and naive to
exploit and to corrupt them; offering in museum and galleries vicariously
scenes and vistas known first hand to the peasantry immemorially; employing
workers only when employers could profit from their labor; proliferating
enticements designed to appeal to the basest of desires; polluting air and
water and all of the residue of nature in its jurisdiction and beyond; and
forever profiting from the hinterland by selling dearly inferior and
superfluous stuff and buying cheaply that without which the city could
not persist for a week.
Jacques Ellul in his book The Meaning of the City writes an appropriate
malediction of it: “The city, then, cannot function except as a parasite;
it needs constant contributions from the outside. One might be tempted to
speak of exchange, but the city has nothing to exchange. What the city
produces is for her own use. Notwithstanding tractors, electricity, and
fertilizer, what the city can produce for the country is absurd and
ridiculous compared with what she receives. As for her spiritual worth,
her ferment of ideas will be of use nowhere but in the city. On the other
hand, she spoils peasant values with remarkable virtuosity. Such values are
disappearing under urban influence because they are the ‘defects’ of urban
values. The very character of the city, in the economic field or in the
intellectual, artistic, or humanitarian, is to receive from the outside, to
consume, and to produce things without value or meaning, usable only inside
the city and to her gain.”
Man has produced an urban environment that is antithetical to nature’s. His
environment is one in which peasant values and peasants themselves are
scorned. Peasants taught and lived and practiced frugality, pay-as-you-go,
providence, work, sacrifice, neighborliness, fidelity, familial priority,
and environmental stewardship. In man’s city, his substitute for nature,
none of the above are taught, lived or practiced except by a few
eccentrics.
The credit card has seduced him to live and practice extravagance and
obscene consumption. Any job that requires sweat is unspeakable. Sacrifice
is out; fulfillment is in. Fidelity is a laugh. Degradation of the earth is
proper so long as the benefits accrue to the deserving, namely, the human
elite. And although sex is queen and breasts and pecs are enhanced and
exhibited ad nauseam, every means designed by scientists and passed down
by the tales of old wives are used to make coitus sterile and the womb a
place of recreation instead of generation.
Man’s environment is at war with nature’s environment, a war man cannot hope
to win even though he may prevail in a battle or two. For him even to hope
to win exhibits an arrogance and hubris beyond understanding , beyond
reason, beyond faith, beyond all evidence. More men and women need to stand
on hilltops at night and look into the heavens and then ask how can man in
all this wonderment standing on this speck of it think that he can in
his finiteness recreate earth more to his profit and less to his cost
than whatever infinite power put together all of this in the first
place.
The feminist that feels the yank on her womb and the need to be there is
listening to what every human should listen to, nay, must listen to. It is
the voice of sanity, speaking the words of salvation and urging one to
comply with the natural order of the soul, and it is the voice that man
has listened to the better part of his existence but that is now weakly
heard, if at all, under the din of the preachments of false prophet and the
triumphant chorus of scientists probing nature’s secrets with patents in
mind.
Perry Mann is a former teacher, a lawyer, a former prosecuting attorney
of Summers County and a regular columnist for the Nicholas Chronicle in
Summersville. Born in Charleston, WV, in 1921, he lives in Hinton. The
portrait accompanying this column is by Robert Shetterley from his book
“Americans Who Tell The Truth.”






